Updates

> Use Case Status tab to Know your Case details// This Option Redirects to SMC Data Base

Best Viewed in Mozilla Firefox latest Version

Date/Time:

Disposals is August


S.NoS.No in No.4Case No Crime No.Complainant AgeAccusedAgeU/sec of LawResult and Date
1123CC498/17Cr.No.79/17TANUKU RURAL PSKolli Peddi Raju, APSRTC Driver, Tanuku52304 (A) IPCPolice Present . Accused reported died. Hence Case Against accused in abated on 2.8.18
2420CC1042/17-JayaLakshmi Fertilisers, Venkatarayapuram Rep by Parimi Venkateswara Rao40P Sangappa Prop. Sri Kethaki Sangameshwara Traders, Nizambabd138 OF NI ACTComplainant Present. As Per orders in crl.M.p No.1371/18. Complaint Dismissed as with drawn on 2.8.18
3421CC1043/17-JayaLakshmi Fertilisers, Venkatarayapuram Rep by Parimi Venkateswara Rao44B Purushotham Prop. Sri sai Durga Fertilisers Seeds Pesticides,Mancheriala138 OF NI ACTComplainant Present. As Per orders in crl.M.p No.1372/18. Complaint Dismissed as with drawn on 2.8.18
4201CC1052/17-Sri Krishna Kalyan Associates Rep by its Guthula Venkata Satyanarayan Murthy, Tanuku64` Bhogavalli Venkata Ramakrishna, Teeparru42138 OF NI ACTBoth Parties Present. As Per Orders in Crl.M.P.No1398/2018. dt. 3.8.18 the matter is Advanced to 3.8.18. As per orders in Crl.Mp.no1399/2018. The Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn on 3.8.18
5203CC35/18-Inti Adinarayana, Kathavapadu56Pulletikurthi Naga Satya Venkata Acharya Tanuku35138 OF NI ACTAccused Present filed petition U/sec 70(2) crpc. As per orders in Crl.M.P.No1364/18. the matter is advanced to 6.8.18. Both Complainant and accused present. As per orders in Crl.M.P.No.1363/18. The Complainant is Dismissed 6.8.18
6182CC588/17-Sakinala Udayabhaskara Rao, Tanuku38Alapati Uma Seshagiri, Duvva138 OF NI ACTAs per Orders in Crl.M.P.No1370/18. The matter is advanced to 6.8.18. Complainant and accused present. As per orders in Crl.M.P.No 1371/18. The complainant is dismissed as withdrawn on 6.8.18
7401CC43/18-Satti Sattireddy, Marteru 63Meka Durga Krishna , Aachanta35138 OF NI ACTComplainant Present. Accused absent PFA No repreentation. Complainant filed petition to withdraw the case petition is allowed. Complainant is dismissed as with drawn 7.8.18
8176CC303/17-Sheik Sileman Shariff, Nidadavolu38Sheik Rahimunnisa, Rajahmundry138 OF NI ACTBoth parties and their Counsels are present. The matter settled before Lok adalat. The complainant compromised the case for the offence U/sec 138 of NI Act the accused is acquitted U/sec 320(8) CRPC accordingly award is passed. 7.8.18
9146CC486/16Cr.No.48/16PERAVALI PSPadala Srinivasa Rao, Usulumarru41431 R/W 34 IPCAs Per Proceedings of Hon'ble Prl.District court, west godavari, eluru. In Dis.No.5873, dated 1.8.18. This record was withdrawn from this court, and transferred to II Addl.Judl 1st class Masgistrate court, tanuku for disposal according to Law on 7.8.18
103CC408/13-Kasagani Anjaneyulu, Tanuku47Iyesetti saraswathi, undrajavaram42138 OF NI ACTComplainant present. Accused absent PFA. As per Orders in Crl.MP.No /2018. The Complaint is Dismissed as withdrawn on 8.8.2018
11108CC62/17Cr.No.19/17UNDRAJAVARAM PSAdabala Jagadeesh, K.Savaram22338 IPCSettled Before lok adalat on 10.8.18
12327CC127/18-Karri Rama Krishna Reddy, Neggipudi 60Varasala Suryanarayana, Rajahmundry45138 OF NI ACTSettled Before lok adalat on 10.8.18
1381CC244/16-Aaketi Prasada Rao, Neggipudi58Aaketi Venkata Rao, Neggipudi48138 OF NI ACT"13.8.2018 Both parties present. Judgment pronounced vide separately. Accused found guilty for the offence U/sec 138 of NI Act Punishable U/sec 142 of NI Act and convicted U/sec 255(1) Cr.p.c. The accused was questioned before passing sentence U/sec 255(2) Cr.P.C. He pleaded he has not done any offence Considering his Please as he is found guilty for the offence U/sec 138 of NI Act punishable U/sec 142 of NI Act. He is sentenced to undergo. One Year simple imprisonment and also liable to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand Only ) or in default of payment of fine or in default. He shall undergo two months of S.I. The remand period if any shall be set off U/Sec 428 Cr.P.C.
"
1466CC390/16-Gaarapati Dilip Kumar, Paalangi42Guduri Seetharamayya, Kaanuru60138 OF NI ACTComplainant absent. Accused Present. Judgement pronounced vide separately . Complainant fail to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Accused acquitted u/sec 255(2) Cr.p.c for the offcence u/sec 138 punishable u/sec 142 of NI Act 14.8.18
15366CC937/17-Katta Satyanaraya Murthy Guptha , Tanuku55G V V S S Seshagiri Rao, Eluru50138 OF NI ACTBoth Parties Present. As Per Orders in Crl.M.P.No1536/2018. dt. 16.8.18. The Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn on 16.8.18
16202CC31/18-koppisetti Murthy Babu, tanuku32Dunnala Srinivasu, Tanuku35138 OF NI ACTComplainant absent. No representation. Inspite of time take give steps was taken although the complainant reported died. Hence, the complaint dismissed for default. On 16.8.18
17200CC828/17-Gadde Haribabu, Tanuku 65Manyam Panduranga Vishnumurthy, kommara48138 OF NI ACTSettled Before Lok Adalat on 25.8.18
18215CC170/18-Vegesna Padmavathi, Penugonda60Doddipatla Subrahmanyam, Penugonda45138 OF NI ACTComplainant Present. As per Orders In Crl.M.P.No.1604/18. The matter is advanced to 27.8.18. As per Orders in Crl.M.P.No.1608/18. The Complaint is dismissed aswithdrawn on 27.8.2018
194CC177/14-Alapati Kasi Subbrayan, Duvva52Inti Sri Rama Murthy, Duvva40138 OF NI ACTBoth Parties Present. As Per Orders in Crl.Mp 1651/2018, The Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn at the Stay of Arguments on 28.8.2018
20463CC315/17Kotipalli Sirnivasa Rao, Iragavaram43Tanuku Laksshman Kumar, Lingapalem, Chintalapudi138 OF NI ACTComplainant Present. As per orders in CrlM.p. 1641/18. CC dismissed as with drawn on 28.8.18
2148CC267/16-Kovvuri Srinivasa Reddy, Iragavaram36Parimi Sarvaryudu, Mandapaka138 OF NI ACTComplainant Present. Accused absent PFA. As per Orders in Crl.MP.No1670 /2018. The Complaint is Dismissed as withdrawn on 29.8.2018
22448CC676/17-Kongarapu Srinivasa Rao, Tanuku39Avidi Subhramanyam, Tanuku40138 OF NI ACTComplainant absent from April 2018 Although 4 to 5 adjournments were given. No representation on behalf of complainant. Batta for issuance of summons not paid. Hence, I see no grounds for adjournment the matter and I feel complainant has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence the complainant is dismissed for default.. dismissed on 29.8.18
2350CC275/16-Batchu paleena, Tanuku58Kali vijaya prasada Rao, Machilipatnam35138 OF NI ACTComplainant present. As per orders in Crl.MP.1717/18 the complaint is dismissed as with drawn on 30.8.2018
24390CC693/17-Yatham Kondayya , Tanuku34Vandanapu Veera Venkata Subrahmanyam, tanuku50138 OF NI ACTComplainant Present . As per Orders in Crl.M.P. 1729/18. The Complaint is dismissed as with drawn On 31.8.18